A Berlin lawyer writes mystery stories. Now he writes about his own case? He must not, because a lawyer is bound to the paragraph of secrecy. Similarly, when psychologists write about their clients, people need to alienate others in order not to be convicted. Moreover, it is about stories. A one to one transfer of the real to the literature does not exist. The stories like based on real cases, enough room for fiction remains. That fiction is at work, you can see from the fact that some stories take place after the same pattern: The crime, as it happened, the judiciary, often a surprising end, an amazing plot.
The reader is confronted with incredibly brutal murders, which could easily have come from a cheap horror movie, but also preserved here von Schirach its strict laconic narrative that leaves me speechless. Perhaps perversely expressed, but as a brilliant piece of brutality in the literature is the scene on the subway station in the history of "self defense". This story is very interesting anyway, because nothing runs out in Schedule F. We remember a news story about two metro-bats, which have beaten an old man hospitalized. Schirach's story is completely different from, in the end I have a suspicion Schirach might have mixed two cases to a story. How different is the story of the Ethiopian who robs a bank, a bank employee with the robber compassion.
From the form of a story Schirach falls out completely, however, if he even appears in his stories as a professional legal adviser, either as a Co-insurers or as a bearer of legal expertise to the reader. This fact diminishes. The book is a Page Turner. The stories are current on entertainment value established. To remind me of some stories that I had after reading page back again.
0 comments:
Post a Comment